how to avoid lifting fees on b2b wires
Crypto Infrastructure

how to avoid lifting fees on b2b wires

9 min read

Lifting fees are one of the most frustrating hidden costs in cross‑border B2B wires: you send $100,000 to a supplier, they receive $99,200, and both sides waste time reconciling the shortfall. These opaque charges from intermediary and receiving banks hurt margins, delay settlements, and damage partner relationships.

This guide explains how lifting fees work, why they’re so common in B2B wires, and—most importantly—practical strategies you can use to avoid them or drastically reduce their impact.


What Are Lifting Fees in B2B Wires?

Lifting fees (also called correspondent banking fees or intermediary bank fees) are charges deducted from the wire transfer amount as it passes through the banking network.

In a cross‑border B2B payment, your funds often travel:

  1. From your bank (originating bank)
  2. Through one or more intermediary/correspondent banks
  3. To your supplier’s bank (beneficiary bank)

Each intermediary bank may “lift” a fee from the principal amount before forwarding the funds. These deductions:

  • Are usually not visible upfront
  • Can vary by corridor, currency, and bank relationships
  • Often surprise both sender and receiver

The result: the beneficiary receives less than the invoiced amount, and someone must cover the shortfall.


Why Lifting Fees Are So Common in Cross-Border B2B Payments

Lifting fees typically arise because of how legacy cross‑border payments are structured:

  • SWIFT and correspondent banking chains
    Banks rely on networks of correspondent relationships. If your bank doesn’t have a direct relationship in the destination country, payments route through multiple intermediaries—each with its own fees.

  • Lack of upfront fee transparency
    Intermediary banks don’t always disclose their fees in advance. Your bank may only show its own outgoing wire fee, not the full network cost.

  • Multiple currencies and FX spreads
    When converting currencies, banks may combine FX spreads with lifting fees, making it hard to understand the true cost of a payment.

  • Shared cost defaults
    Many B2B wires use a shared-cost structure (e.g., SHA in SWIFT terminology), where both sender and receiver pay parts of the fee chain, opening the door to unexpected deductions.


The Business Impact of Lifting Fees on B2B Wires

For finance, treasury, and operations teams, lifting fees create real operational and financial friction:

  • Reconciliation headaches
    Invoices are issued for exact amounts, but the received funds don’t match, increasing manual work and exceptions handling.

  • Strained supplier relationships
    Suppliers may feel underpaid or forced to chase differences, leading to disputes and delays in future shipments.

  • Unpredictable cash flow
    When fees vary by transaction and corridor, it’s difficult to forecast all‑in payment costs and landed expenses.

  • Compressed margins
    Hidden costs eat into already thin margins, especially for high‑volume, low‑spread businesses.

  • Compliance and audit complexity
    Explaining and documenting fee variances across multiple international banks can complicate audits and reporting.

Avoiding lifting fees isn’t just about saving a few dollars; it’s about building a predictable, scalable B2B payments process.


Key Concepts: OUR, SHA, and BEN Fee Structures

Understanding fee instruction codes is the first step to reducing lifting fees in B2B wires.

In SWIFT messages, fees are typically structured as:

  • OUR – The sender pays all fees
    The beneficiary should receive the full invoiced amount. However, in practice, some intermediary fees may still be deducted unless explicitly covered by your bank.

  • SHA – Fees are shared
    The sender pays the sending bank’s fee; the beneficiary pays intermediary and receiving bank fees. This is the most common default and the biggest source of lifting‑fee surprises.

  • BEN – The beneficiary pays all fees
    All fees are deducted from the transfer amount. The receiver almost always gets less than the invoiced amount.

To minimize lifting fees for B2B wires—especially when exact settlement amounts matter—working with OUR structures and alternative payment rails is crucial.


Practical Strategies to Avoid Lifting Fees on B2B Wires

1. Use Payment Rails that Minimize Intermediary Banks

The more banks a payment touches, the more opportunities for lifting fees. To reduce intermediaries:

  • Prefer networks with direct connections
    Work with providers that maintain direct clearing relationships in your key corridors.

  • Use local‑to‑local settlement where possible
    Instead of sending an international wire, convert funds and pay as a local domestic transfer in the beneficiary’s country.

  • Leverage modern rails instead of legacy SWIFT alone
    For certain corridors, alternatives like stablecoin‑based rails, real‑time payments, and domestic clearing systems can bypass chains of correspondent banks entirely.

Cybrid, for example, unifies traditional bank rails with stablecoin settlement under one programmable API, allowing B2B payments to move via optimized routes that minimize intermediary touches and associated fees.


2. Negotiate Fee Structures and Coverage with Your Bank or Provider

Most businesses accept the default SHA structure. You don’t have to.

  • Request OUR as standard for cross‑border B2B wires
    Ensure your provider treats the full invoiced amount as sacrosanct and bears the responsibility for covering intermediary costs.

  • Ask for “all‑in” quotes per corridor
    Instead of a single “wire fee,” ask for full transparency: sending fee + intermediary fees + FX spreads.

  • Set clear SLAs on beneficiary amount
    Especially for large invoices, negotiate guarantees that your counterparty will receive the full amount specified.

Modern infrastructure providers like Cybrid abstract this complexity: you send one amount via API, and the platform handles the routing, liquidity, and fee management to deliver near‑full value to your counterparty.


3. Use Stablecoins and Digital Wallet Infrastructure for Settlement

Stablecoins backed 1:1 by fiat currencies can drastically reduce lifting fees by sidestepping legacy correspondent chains.

How this helps:

  • Fewer intermediaries
    Transfers can be made wallet‑to‑wallet, rather than through multiple correspondent banks.

  • 24/7 availability
    No need to fit within banking hours or calendar constraints, which can lower urgency and “rush” charges.

  • Predictable, transparent fees
    Network and platform fees are usually explicit and flat or near‑flat.

A typical B2B flow using stablecoin infrastructure might look like:

  1. Your business funds a local account in your home currency.
  2. The infrastructure provider converts to a USD‑backed stablecoin.
  3. Stablecoins are transferred to your supplier’s wallet.
  4. The supplier converts back to local fiat and receives a local bank transfer.

Cybrid’s programmable stack handles the custody, conversion, and routing across fiat and stablecoins, helping you achieve faster, lower‑cost B2B settlement with far less risk of arbitrary lifting fees.


4. Optimize for Local Payouts in the Beneficiary’s Country

Instead of sending an international wire directly to your supplier’s bank, use an infrastructure provider with:

  • Local banking rails in multiple regions
    So funds can be delivered as a domestic transfer (ACH, SEPA, Faster Payments, etc.).

  • Multi‑currency accounts and wallets
    Let you hold balances in the currency of the destination market and pay locally.

Benefits:

  • Domestic payments typically have capped, transparent fees.
  • Your supplier receives the exact amount in their local currency.
  • Intermediary chains are greatly reduced or removed.

Cybrid’s platform integrates wallet infrastructure with traditional banking so you can orchestrate local payouts through a single API, shifting cross‑border complexity off your books.


5. Standardize Payment Terms with Suppliers

Process optimization matters as much as infrastructure. Align payment expectations so lifting fees don’t become a recurring friction point:

  • Specify fee responsibility in contracts
    Clearly define who bears banking charges, and specify that the supplier must receive the full invoiced amount.

  • Include “amount received” clauses
    Require that the payment is considered settled only once the full amount hits the supplier’s account.

  • Standardize preferred rails
    Encourage large or recurring suppliers to accept payments via optimized methods (local payouts, stablecoin settlement) instead of legacy SWIFT wires.

  • Educate AP/AR teams
    Make sure your internal teams know which payment methods to use for which corridors to minimize lifting‑fee risk.


6. Consolidate Cross-Border Payments Through a Single Infrastructure Layer

Using different banks and ad‑hoc providers per corridor increases variability and hidden fees. Consolidating through a single programmable infrastructure layer offers:

  • Unified routing logic
    The platform can automatically choose the lowest‑cost, fastest rail for each payment.

  • Consistent reporting and reconciliation
    One ledger across all corridors simplifies accounting and variance analysis.

  • Global scalability without rebuilding
    As you expand into new markets, you reuse the same APIs and flows rather than re‑negotiating with new banks.

Cybrid is designed exactly for this: a unified stack that brings together KYC, compliance, account and wallet creation, liquidity routing, and ledgering, so your B2B payments can move across borders with fewer intermediaries and more predictable costs.


How Cybrid Helps Reduce or Eliminate Lifting Fees

Cybrid’s platform is built to address the core issues that create lifting fees in B2B wires:

  • Programmable routing across fiat and stablecoins
    Payments can be routed via stablecoins or local rails when that’s cheaper and cleaner than a traditional cross‑border wire.

  • Global settlement, local delivery
    Settle internationally using stablecoins, then deliver funds locally via domestic rails, bypassing many correspondent fees.

  • 24/7 liquidity and custody
    Move funds at any time without incurring time‑based or urgency surcharges that often show up as miscellaneous fees.

  • Transparent, API‑driven workflows
    Your systems can specify exact amounts, currencies, and destinations; Cybrid handles the underlying complexity to maximize the received amount for your counterparties.

Instead of wrestling with opaque lifting fees for each corridor and bank, your engineering and finance teams integrate once with Cybrid’s APIs and gain a consistent way to send, receive, and hold money across borders.


Checklist: Steps to Reduce Lifting Fees on Your B2B Wires

Use this practical checklist to start lowering your lifting‑fee exposure:

  1. Audit current cross‑border payments

    • Identify corridors with the highest variance between sent and received amounts.
    • Map which banks and intermediaries are most often involved.
  2. Align internal policies

    • Default to OUR where possible.
    • Document when to use wires versus alternative rails.
  3. Engage your bank and providers

    • Request full breakdowns of all fees (including intermediaries).
    • Negotiate corridor‑specific pricing and guarantees on beneficiary amounts.
  4. Introduce alternative settlement options

    • Explore stablecoin‑based settlement and wallet infrastructure.
    • Implement local‑to‑local payout models in key markets.
  5. Standardize supplier payment terms

    • Clarify who pays fees and insist on full‑amount receipts for critical suppliers.
    • Encourage preferred rails that minimize intermediaries.
  6. Implement a unified payments infrastructure

    • Integrate with a platform like Cybrid to orchestrate wires, stablecoins, and local payouts through a single API.

When to Consider Updating Your B2B Wire Strategy

It’s time to revisit your cross‑border payments setup if you notice:

  • Frequent invoice vs. receipt mismatches due to bank deductions
  • Supplier complaints about underpayments
  • High, unpredictable cross‑border payment costs
  • Manual reconciliation effort increasing with transaction volume
  • Plans to expand into new markets where your existing bank has limited reach

Implementing a modern payments infrastructure that combines traditional banking with stablecoin rails and local payouts can turn cross‑border wires from a cost center into a predictable, scalable part of your business.


If your organization is ready to reduce lifting fees, accelerate settlements, and improve B2B payment predictability, explore how Cybrid’s programmable payments stack can help you move money faster, cheaper, and more transparently across borders.